![]() Instead of using a proper technique, they preferred the easy route: UPEK Protector Suite simply stores the original password to Windows account, making it possible for an intruder to obtain one. While biometric logon could be implemented that way, UPEK apparently failed. In onderstaande tabel wordt dat verduidelijkt en vindt u informatie over de ruwheid van de pakkingsvlakken. The common perception is that biometric logon is just as, or maybe more secure than password-based one. Voor normale bedrijfsomstandigheden dient de as ter plaatse van de oliekeerring een oppervlakteruwheid te hebben van: Ra CLA Rz Rmax. However, fingerprint logon is rarely, if ever, barred. If you use the Windows auto-logon feature, you’ll see a message saying “Using automatic logon can pose a security risk because anyone that has access to your computer will have access to your programs and personal files.” Simply said, no corporate user will ever use this “automatic logon” feature, which is often banned by corporate security policies. Putting things into perspective: Windows itself never stores account passwords unless you enable “automatic login”, which is discouraged by Microsoft. Having physical access to a laptop running UPEK Protector Suite, we could extract passwords to all user accounts with fingerprint-enabled logon. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |